Use of current explanations in multicausal abductive reasoning

نویسندگان

  • Todd R. Johnson
  • Josef F. Krems
چکیده

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Use of Current Explanations in Multicausal Abductive Reasoning Use of Current Explanations in Multicausal Abductive Reasoning

In multicausal abductive tasks a person must explain some findings by assembling a composite hypothesis that consists of one or more elementary hypotheses. If there are n elementary hypotheses, there can be up to 2 composite hypotheses. To constrain the search for hypotheses to explain a new observation, people sometimes use their current explanation—the previous evidence and their present comp...

متن کامل

A Hybrid Learning Model of Abductive Reasoning

Multicausal abductive tasks appear to have deliberate and implicit components: people generate and modify explanations using a series of recognizable steps, but these steps appear to be guided by an implicit hypothesis evaluation process. This paper proposes a hybrid symbolic-connectionist learning architecture for multicausal abduction. The architecture tightly integrates a symbolic Soar model...

متن کامل

Pii: S0364-0213(01)00059-3

In multicausal abductive tasks a person must explain some findings by assembling a composite hypothesis that consists of one or more elementary hypotheses. If there are n elementary hypotheses, there can be up to 2 composite hypotheses. To constrain the search for hypotheses to explain a new observation, people sometimes use their current explanation—the previous evidence and their present comp...

متن کامل

Abduction, Experience, and Goals: a Model of Everyday Abductive Explanation* Abduction, Experience, and Goals: a Model of Everyday Abductive Explanation

Many abductive understanding systems generate explanations by a backwards chaining process that is neutral both to the explainer's previous experience in similar situations and to why the explainer is attempting to explain. This article examines the relationship of such models to an approach that uses case-based reasoning to generate explanations. In this case-based model, the generation of abd...

متن کامل

Abductive Reasoning and Automated Analysis of Feature Models: How are they connected?

In the automated analysis feature models (AAFM), many operations have been defined to extract relevant information to be used on decision making. Most of the proposals rely on logics to give solution to different operations. This extraction of knowledge using logics is known as deductive reasoning. One of the most useful operations are explanations that provide the reasons why some other operat...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Cognitive Science

دوره 25  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2001